Research – Spinal Cord Stimulation

0
1986

** click the blue article titles below for the abstracts
note: recent additions will be added to the top of the list

12 – Spinal cord stimulation for patients with refractory angina and previous coronary surgery

  • Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Nov;82(5):1704-8
  • 51 patients who failed multiple percutaneous and surgical revascularizations and optimal medical therapy, and are NOT candidates for further revascularization attempts (CCS class III/IV angina)
  • >50% reduction of weekly anginal episodes in 88%
  • CCS class decreased to II
  • Significantly improved quality of life

11 – Spinal cord stimulation is an effective treatment for the chronic intractable visceral pelvic pain

  • Pain Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;7(5):440-3
  • Case series of 6 females
  • Repeated hypogastric blocks gave 1-6 weeks relief; neurolytic hypogastric blocks gave 3-12 months relief
  • At an average follow-up of 30.6 months:  Pain score decreased from 8 to 3;  Disability index decreased from 57.7 to 19.5;  Opiate use decreased from 22.5 to 6.6mg of morphine equivalents per day

10 – Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial

  • Neurosurgery. 2005;56(1):98-106
  • 45 patients (SCS group vs Re-operation group) – all patients were selected for reoperation after initial “failed” surgery
  • SCS was more successful than reoperation
  • Re-operation group: more opiate use and more cross-over (to get SCS)
  • ADLs and work status did not differ significantly

9 – Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic non-reconstructible limb ischemia

  • Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2004 Apr;13(2):124-8
  • Evaluating the long-term effects of SCS on limb survival
  • Of the 20 patients that followed-up up to 57 months, 4 died due to acute renal failure or MI, 75% (15) avoided a major amputation

8 – Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials assessing spinal cord stimulation for inoperable critical leg ischemia

  • Br J Surg. 2004 Aug;91(8):948-55
  • Limb salvage at 12 months appeared significantly greater in the SCS group
  • Significantly less pain medication in the SCS group

7 – The effect of spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy: two years’ follow-up of the randomized controlled trial

  • Ann Neurol. 2004 Jan;55(1):13-8
  • SCS+PT vs PT-only (24 and 18 patients, respectively) – results after 2 years
  • Global perceived effect (43% vs 6% “much improved”)
  • No clinically important improvement of functional status
  • Health-related quality of life improved only in the SCS+PT group

6 – Economic evaluation of spinal cord stimulation for chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy

  • Neurology. 2002 Oct 22;59(8):1203-9
  • SCS was both more effective and less costly than the standard treatment protocol (physical therapy)
  • $60,000 cheaper than control therapy over a lifetime

5 – Spinal cord stimulation and quality of life in patients with refractory angina

  • Minerva Anestesiol. 2001 Nov;67(11):803-10.
  • “This technique substantially improves the quality of life of patients suffering from refractory angina.”

4 – Epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation in diabetic critical lower limb ischemia

  • J Diabetes Complications. 1999 Sep-Dec;13(5-6):293-9.
  • 64 diabetics with limb ischemia refractory to medical and surgical treatments
  • Average follow-up of 58 months
  • Pain relief greater than 75% and limb salvage were achieved in 38 diabetic patients
  • Amputation in 17 patients
  • Pedal transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) from dorsum of foot:  An increase of 50% in the first two weeks after implantation was predictive of success.
  • Recommend a trial of two weeks to see if the TcPO(2) increases, before the final decision in terms of cost effectiveness, before the permanent implantation.

3 – Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain–some predictors of success. A 15-year experience

  • Surg Neurol. 1998 Aug;50(2):110-20
  • Analysis of a series of 189 patients
  • Indications for SCS included, failed back syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and others.
    • Patients with all of the above responded well to SCS
    • 42% (with the above diagnoses) were gainfully employed afterward, compared to only 20% before implantation
  • Paraplegic pain, cauda equina syndrome, stump pain, phantom limb pain, and primary bone and joint disease pain did NOT respond as well
  • 42% were gainfully employed (of the successful cases above), compared to 20% before implantation
  • Complications: included hardware malfunction, electrode displacement, infection, and tolerance
  • Better outcomes seen in patients:  shorter time from surgery, and if no surgery at all
  • Multipolar systems has significantly improved clinical reliability over unipolar systems

2 – Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain

  • Spine. 1996 Dec 1;21(23):2786-94.
  • 70 patients with a one-year follow-up
  • Successfully managed pain in 55% of patients [success = >50% pain relief, and patient assessment of procedure being at least partially beneficial]
  • Medication usage and work status were NOT changed significantly
  • Complications in 17%

1 – Prospective outcome evaluation of spinal cord stimulation in patients with intractable leg pain

  • Spine. 1996 Jun 1;21(11):1344-50
  • 40 patients with avg symptom duration of 65.4 months, and avg # of prior lumbar surgeries of 2.3
  • Significant improvement in the Sickness Impact Profile at 2-years
  • Decreased use of narcotic medication in 66% of patients
  • 70% stated it helped them, and they would recommend to others

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here